Every endpoint and XDR vendor in your line card says it stops everything. Your clients can’t tell the claims apart, and in most cases neither can your engineers until something gets past them. The MITRE ATT&CK Evaluations are one of the few places where you can see how a platform actually behaved against a real adversary emulation. They make a useful starting point when you’re deciding which security stack to put your name on.
Cynet is part of Mavenspire’s Super Friends partner ecosystem. Here’s what its 2025 results show, what they don’t show, and what they mean for a service provider.
Cynet’s 2025 MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise results
100%
Detection visibility
90 of 90 attack sub-steps
100%
Technique coverage
90 of 90 technique-level detections
100%
Protection
5 of 5 malicious steps blocked
0
Detection false positives
0 of 17 legitimate sub-steps flagged
Cynet reports that it hit all of this with zero configuration changes and no delayed detections, and that this is its third straight year of outstanding results. Source: Cynet’s published 2025 results. The raw evaluation data is at evals.mitre.org.
What MITRE does, and doesn’t, tell you
MITRE doesn’t crown winners, rank vendors or hand out scores. It runs a structured adversary emulation, from initial access through lateral movement and exfiltration, and publishes the raw data. It’s up to each vendor to interpret that data, and up to you to check it. Treat any vendor’s MITRE headline, including this one, as a reason to look at the data, not a substitute for looking.
Two things are worth checking in any vendor’s results:
- Configuration changes. If a vendor needed mid-test tuning to catch the attack, your engineers will need that same tuning in every client environment. Results with no config changes are much closer to what you’ll get on day one.
- Protection, not just detection. An alert at 2 a.m. still needs a human. A blocked step doesn’t.
Why it matters for a service provider
For an MSP, MSSP or VAR, the platform’s results end up in your margin and your reputation:
- Less tuning per client means faster onboarding and fewer engineering hours burned on each new tenant.
- Fewer false positives means a SOC (yours or a partner’s) that spends its time on real threats instead of noise.
- Automatic protection means fewer incidents that turn into all-hands escalations on your watch.
Where Mavenspire fits
A strong platform is only half the answer. The other half is how it’s designed, deployed and run across your client base. Mavenspire works behind your brand as a white-label engineering partner:
- Diagnose: find the gaps in your current security stack and how it’s actually run.
- Advise: compare leading platforms, Cynet included, against your clients, your bench and your margins.
- Engineer: design, deploy and integrate the platform so it performs the way it did in the evaluation.
- Manage: back up your team with senior engineering depth when the normal escalation path runs out.
You keep the client relationship, the contract and the credit. We help you deliver the result. Learn more about our security engineering work or how we partner with providers.
See how Cynet would fit your stack
Book a working session with a Mavenspire engineer. We’ll walk through the platform, the MITRE data and what it would take to deliver it under your brand.